Hormonal assessment of women submitted to tubal ligationLETICIA FAGUNDES, Maria; CELIA MENDES, Maria; CARBOL PATTA, Maristela et al.Contraception (Stoneham). 2005, Vol 71, Num 4, pp 309-314, issn 0010-7824, 6 p.Article

Abdominopelvic inspection during nonemergent laparoscopic procedures: Who looks?HANIF, Farhan; ANASTI, James N.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2004, Vol 190, Num 5, pp 1414-1415, issn 0002-9378, 2 p.Article

Tubal ligation via posterior colpotomyAYHAN, A; BOYNUKALIN, K; SALMAN, M. C et al.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics. 2006, Vol 93, Num 3, pp 254-255, issn 0020-7292, 2 p.Article

Tubal ligation and the risk of vertebral fracturesWYSHAK, Grace.Osteoporosis international. 2005, Vol 16, Num 6, pp 651-658, issn 0937-941X, 8 p.Article

Factors affecting the pregnancy rate after microsurgical reversal of tubal ligationHANAFI, Magdi M.Fertility and sterility. 2003, Vol 80, Num 2, pp 434-440, issn 0015-0282, 7 p.Article

Contraceptive sterilization among married adults: national data on who chooses vasectomy and tubal sterilizationANDERSON, John E; JAMIESON, Denise J; WARNER, Lee et al.Contraception (Stoneham). 2012, Vol 85, Num 6, pp 552-557, issn 0010-7824, 6 p.Article

The risk of hydrosalpinx formation and adnexectomy following tubal ligation and subsequent hysterectomy : A historical cohort studyMORSE, Abraham N; SCHROEDER, Clayton B; MAGRINA, Javier F et al.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2006, Vol 194, Num 5, pp 1273-1276, issn 0002-9378, 4 p.Article

Tubal ligation does not affect hormonal changes during the early menopausal transitionNELSON, Deborah B; SAMMEL, Mary D; FREEMAN, Ellen W et al.Contraception (Stoneham). 2005, Vol 71, Num 2, pp 104-110, issn 0010-7824, 7 p.Article

Impact of tubal ligation on ovarian reserve as measured by anti-Müllerian hormone levels: a prospective cohort studyDA SILVA, Ana Luiza Berwanger; DA RE, Camila; DIETRICH, Cristine et al.Contraception (Stoneham). 2013, Vol 88, Num 6, pp 700-705, issn 0010-7824, 6 p.Article

Development and validation of a Medicaid Postpartum Tubal Sterilization Knowledge QuestionnaireZITE, Nikki B; WALLACE, Lorraine S.Contraception (Stoneham). 2007, Vol 76, Num 4, pp 287-291, issn 0010-7824, 5 p.Article

Barriers to obtaining a desired postpartum tubal sterilizationZITE, Nikki; WUELLNER, Sara; GILLIAM, Melissa et al.Contraception (Stoneham). 2006, Vol 73, Num 4, pp 404-407, issn 0010-7824, 4 p.Article

A qualitative study of barriers to postpartum sterilization and women's attitudes toward unfulfilled sterilization requestsGILLIAM, Melissa; DAVIS, Shawna D; BERLIN, Amy et al.Contraception (Stoneham). 2008, Vol 77, Num 1, pp 44-49, issn 0010-7824, 6 p.Article

Vasectomy: the other (better) form of sterilizationSHIH, Grace; TUROK, David K; PARKER, Willie J et al.Contraception (Stoneham). 2011, Vol 83, Num 4, pp 310-315, issn 0010-7824, 6 p.Article

Risk factors for tubal ligation : regret and psychological effects Impact of Beck Depression InventoryKELEKCI, Sefa; ERDEMOGLU, Evrim; KUTLUK, Sehnaz et al.Contraception (Stoneham). 2005, Vol 71, Num 6, pp 417-420, issn 0010-7824, 4 p.Article

Probability of pregnancy after sterilization: a comparison of hysteroscopic versus laparoscopic sterilizationGARIEPY, Aileen M; CREININ, Mitchell D; SMITH, Kenneth J et al.Contraception (Stoneham). 2014, Vol 90, Num 2, pp 174-181, issn 0010-7824, 8 p.Article

The safety, efficacy and acceptability of task sharing tubal sterilization to midlevel providers: a systematic reviewRODRIGUEZ, Maria Isabel; GORDON-MACLEAN, Cristin.Contraception (Stoneham). 2014, Vol 89, Num 6, pp 504-511, issn 0010-7824, 8 p.Article

Qualitative and quantitative analysis of women's perceptions of transvaginal surgeryBINGENER, Juliane; SLOAN, Jeff A; GHOSH, Karthik et al.Surgical endoscopy. 2012, Vol 26, Num 4, pp 998-1004, issn 0930-2794, 7 p.Article

Factors influencing physicians' advice about female sterilization in USA: a national surveyLAWRENCE, R. E; RASINSKI, K. A; YOON, J. D et al.Human reproduction (Oxford. Print). 2011, Vol 26, Num 1, pp 106-111, issn 0268-1161, 6 p.Article

Factors Predictive for Failure to Perform Postpartum Tubal Ligations Following Vaginal DeliverySEIBEL-SEAMON, Jolene; VISINTINE, John F; LEIBY, Benjamin E et al.Journal of reproductive medicine. 2009, Vol 54, Num 3, pp 160-164, issn 0024-7758, 5 p.Article

Rapid reaccumulation of hydrometra after drainage at embryo transfer in patients with hydrosalpinxHINCKLEY, Mary D; MILKI, Amin A.Fertility and sterility. 2003, Vol 80, Num 5, pp 1268-1271, issn 0015-0282, 4 p.Conference Paper

Underlying mechanisms of ovarian cancer risk reduction after tubal ligationCIBULA, David; WIDSCHWENDTER, Martin; ZIKAN, Michael et al.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica scandinavica. 2011, Vol 90, Num 6, pp 559-563, issn 0001-6349, 5 p.Article

Unfulfilled Postpartum Sterilization RequestsRIES THURMAN, Andrea; HARVEY, Dalila; SHAIN, Rochelle N et al.Journal of reproductive medicine. 2009, Vol 54, Num 8, pp 467-472, issn 0024-7758, 6 p.Article

Contraceptive sterilization use among married men in the United States: results from the male sample of the National Survey of Family GrowthANDERSON, John E; WARNER, Lee; JAMIESON, Denise J et al.Contraception (Stoneham). 2010, Vol 82, Num 3, pp 230-235, issn 0010-7824, 6 p.Article

Does bupivacaine in laparoscopic ports reduce postsurgery pain in tubal ligation by electrocoagulation? A randomized controlled trialSAVARIS, Ricardo F; CHICAR, Lydia L; CRISTOVAM, Rafael S et al.Contraception (Stoneham). 2010, Vol 81, Num 6, pp 542-546, issn 0010-7824, 5 p.Article

Ovarian morphology of rats after fallopian tube sterilizationAYGEN, Ercan M; ÖZDAMAR, Saim; SERIN, Serdar et al.Contraception (Stoneham). 2002, Vol 66, Num 3, pp 211-214, issn 0010-7824, 4 p.Article